Douglas Tomuriesa, Pope Francis and James Marape

Image
  Opposition Leader Douglas Tomuriesa said he is disappointed and embarrassed over the way His Holiness Pope Francis was treated by Prime Minister James Marape over the last three-days during the Papal visit, and the lack of courtesy and respect shown by the Prime Minister. He said the Prime Minister continuously declares PNG as a ‘Christian country’ and prides himself on being a religious individual but he was surprised when the Pope was continuously snubbed by the PM over the weekend since the Pope’s arrival on Friday. “The Pope is the head of the Catholic church, the largest Christian church in the world and he is also a head of state. “PNG not only being a Christian country, but a country that prides itself as a ‘friend to all, enemy to none’, the PM should be according the Pope with the highest level of respect,” Tomuriesa said. The Opposition Leader pointed out that on Friday, the Prime Minister did not welcome the Pope at the airport, a tradition he had accorded to many othe...

Powi queries benefits of project infrastructure

 


Main Stories

SOUTHERN Highlands Governor William Powi questioned the benefits of the infrastructure of the Papua LNG project, a pipeline to transfer gas into Kutubu and the aging facilities of the Kutubu, Gobe and Kikori oil fields.
His questions were directed at Minister for Petroleum Kerenga Kua.
Powi said: “We were previously led to believe that the P’nyang project was part of the LNG project, as it is now P’nyang is a separate project.”
Before Powi could continue, Abau MP Sir Puka Temu interjected with a point of order, saying: “P’nyang was never part of the PNG LNG project, the governor has got it wrong.”
However, his point of order was overruled by Deputy Speaker Koni Iguan who allowed Powi to continue his questioning.
Powi said: “If the P’nyang and the PNG LNG project are separate, are you going to build under that new project a pipeline to utilise the gas into the Kutubu PNG LNG facilities and the pipeline into Gulf and Central provinces?
“What is there for us, the landowners, under the PNG LNG. Under this new project, using the facilities, do we have any benefits in terms of toll for the use of the facilities?
“And finally, for Kutubu, Gobe and Kikori which are oil fields facilities that are aging, can the State talk to the developers, district and provincial and landowners to own these aging facilities and participate in business?” Kua said: “Initially there were talks of whether or not PNGLNG and P’nyang could be a joint project.
“However, it was decided that it would be kept two separate and distinct projects.
“PNG LNG and P’nyang are now separate projects.
“For the purposes of reducing the operating costs and maximising profitability, it was decided it would be necessary for P’nyang project to use some of the pre-existing infrastructure of PNG LNG, but whenever that happens, there are arrangements in place so that the joint venture partners of P’nyang will pay the joint venture partners of PNG LNG for the use of the common facilities.
“I assure the usage of the facilities will not be for free, there will be a fee imposed between the two separate projects.
“I am not aware of any provision in the PNG LNG agreement for aged infrastructure ownership to be transferred to the landowners, province and the state.
“I am not aware of any provision and it would be unlikely to have a provision in place.
“It was for that reason, my department initiated with the support of NEC of the Papua LNG agreement to have among a provision that will say when the capital outlays for the pipeline is paid down, the ownership will be transferred or sold to the provincial, landowners and state.
“The three can collect revenue, Total has agreed to that in principle.
“I doubt that there is provision in the PNG LNG agreement. If there is a provision, I will report to Parliament.”

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

US$9bil P’nyang deal set

O’Neill: Our People the Losers in the 2024 Record Taxing Budget

3,000-plus to work when mine reopens

Families on repatriation